Brevity can be a virtue sometimes. In this case, it offers the opportunity to pinpoint rather easily the author's elementary mistakes in economics, especially the labor market. oh and "the economy still has just the same amount of money circulating through it"?? ha. Don't we wish it was a true statement!References :

the only thing to have had a more detrimental impact on those things was the institution of slavery…it wins, but not by as much as you would think. and look what happened there…References :

That feminism has done more than probably any other social or political force to destroy the family than any other in modern history??

… that it has been most major in promoting competition rather than co-operation and unification between men and women – certainly, between husbands and wives…

that it has caused great uncertainty and much instability between men and women … that it has been a most powerful influence in the destruction or killing of potential babies…

That ever since its prime inception there has been incredible increase in divorce, single-parented children, and increased instability concerning the commitment of husband-wife, and of intimate male-female relationships generally…

That it has caused tired people – male and female – who both come home from work dog-tired and just want to just collapse, buy cheap take-aways for their own and their children’s meals and wonder why America and the rest of the Western world is becoming so unhealthy and obese…

That it has caused such high rates of unemployment throughout the western world, in that females now demand former ‘male’ jobs in a limited ‘job-market’ …

And all this being further frustrated by the fact that working wives/women tend to have many less children – in order to place their “careers” first – but the key is that it is mainly “children that provide work [as in ‘jobs’] for adults” … So feminism has economically, ‘created a HUGE vicious circle’, in terms of destroying jobs and economies in the west over its 40 years!

… that increased division and divorces have meant that family members have had to split their abodes of living … meaning that where an entire family was living in one home, that same group, after divorce or break-up, now needs a minimum of two places to live, thus placing enormous [unnecessary] pressure on the demand for and price of housing and accommodation – No wonder the prices of housing have powered up economically over the past 30 years to where young people today find the dream of home ownership just that!!…

… that attempting to get both husband and wife into limited employment vacancies, in many ways, means greater inequality than ever – in modern terms, as it means homes/families with DUAL incomes as opposed to homes with NO jobs or income – only as government benefits and taxes have had to be greatly increased … to only partially accommodate!

WHAT A MESS!!

Further, the economies have now responded to the presence of many with dual incomes, which effectively means that prices of goods and services, generally, have arisen to the point where what was once deemed an “opportunity” for women to work has now become an “economic necessity” for them to work!!

… that driving women out to work has almost Necessitated that businesses have to operate 7 days per week now, because both ‘spouses’ work during [previously].normal’ hours … but, you see, the economy still has just the same amount of money circulating through it, whether we work 7 days or 4 days [!!]; so this means far less efficiency for ‘business’ to make its money!! … in fact, costs to operate the same turnover through ‘the turnstiles’ over 7 days are greater than the costs of making the same money over 5 days!

Additionally, driving women out to work has not only ‘helped’ [along with other feminist ideas] to greatly increase single-parented children – usually meaning the female parent, but has resulted in an almost complete ‘take over’ of primary and secondary school education by females – so that many boys become ‘feminized’, and wonder why they turn out ‘gay’ with little male leadership in their lives, at the other end!!

… So that, before we know it, the vast % of the world, will be living singularly, by comparison with previously! … and many will die part of a very lonely, unstable existence!!

Has feminism been good for women??

Well … you tell me!!…

As a colleague of mine said to me just a few years ago:

“Any Thinking person can see that feminists haven’t done women any big favors!”

What think ye of these things??